Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал: http://ir.librarynmu.com/handle/123456789/1567
Назва: The Object of Research of Medicine and Its Place in the System of Modern Knowledge.
Автори: Vermenko, A.
Ключові слова: philosophy of medicine, philosophical anthropology, biomedical model of human personality, the ontology of general medical science
Дата публікації: 11-чер-2019
Видавництво: Bohomoletz National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine
Бібліографічний опис: The main object of research of medicine was and is during all the historical periods the human in all the fullness of its definitions beginning with physical body and finishing with social, psychical and spiritual qualities of personality. Medicine researches all the aspects of human life activity which are related to the problem of human health and disease, norm and pathology in all their diversity and specific relations of human and its natural, social and cultural environment. The specific laws of medicine are the objective laws of normal and pathological life activity of human organism and human personality.
Серія/номер: «Релігія та медицина». Матеріали міжнародної науково-практичної конференції, присвяченої пам’яті свт. Луки (В. Ф. Войно-Ясенецького).;НМУ ім. О.О.Богомольця, 11-12.06.2019. — C. 145-147
Короткий огляд (реферат): The ontology of general medical science includes a set of logical definitions of most general terms that are used across medical disciplines, including: 'disease', 'disorder', 'disease course', 'diagnosis', and 'patient'. It provides a formal theory of disease that is elaborated further by which extended by specific disease ontology, including the infectious disease ontology and the mental disease ontology. The main field of researches is restricted to humans, but many terms and methods can be applied to other organisms as well. The ontology of medicine recently developed a special interest the idea of causality because the purpose of medical research is to reveal causes of disease and causes of healing. The scientific processes used to generate causal knowledge give clues to the metaphysics of causation. For example, there is quite popular idea that randomized controlled trials are more helpful in revealing causal relationships than observational studies. Here causation is understood as counterfactually dependent, so the main difference of randomized controlled trials from observational studies is that they have a comparison group in which the intervention of interest is not given. Main causal paradigms in biomedicine are the linear mono-factorial paradigm championed mainly in clinical medicine; and the non-linear, reciprocal, multi-factorial paradigm invoked in epidemiology.
Опис: Тези Міжнародної науково-практичної конференції «Релігія та медицина», присвяченої пам’яті свт. Луки (В. Ф. Войно-Ясенецького). — НМУ ім. О.О.Богомольця, 11-12.06.2019. — C. 145-147.
URI (Уніфікований ідентифікатор ресурсу): http://ir.librarynmu.com/handle/123456789/1567
Розташовується у зібраннях:Наукові публікації кафедри філософії, біоетики та історії медицини

Файли цього матеріалу:
Файл Опис РозмірФормат 
VermenkoThesis6-2019.pdfThesis for International Scientific Conference "Religion and Medicine", Kyiv, Bohomolets National Medical University, 11-12.06.201991,26 kBAdobe PDFПереглянути/Відкрити


Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.