http://ir.librarynmu.com/handle/123456789/2591 2026-04-14T20:50:41Z 2026-04-14T20:50:41Z Lunov, V. http://ir.librarynmu.com/handle/123456789/16635 2025-11-07T09:10:49Z 2025-01-01T00:00:00Z

Название: Post-COVID syndrome as a factor complicating sence of coherence and it's interplay with individual cognitive styles Авторы: Lunov, V. Краткий осмотр (реферат): Abstract. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers and clinicians alike have turned their attention to the so-called post-COVID syndrome: a constellation of persistent symptoms - ranging from fatigue and impaired memory to mood disturbances - that can continue for months or even years after the acute infection subsides. Beyond its biological underpinnings, post-COVID syndrome demands renewed focus on how psychosocial resources facilitate (or hinder) longterm adaptation. One lens that elucidates these challenges is Aaron Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence (SOC), which comprises three core dimensions: comprehensibility, manageability, and meaningfulness. Individuals with a high SOCare typically better equipped to confront persistent health stressors through effective coping, structured sense-making, and the conviction that their efforts remain purposeful. In parallel, the concept of cognitive styles provides vital insights into how people habitually process and respond to information. Styles such as field dependence (FD) versus field independence (FI), cognitive flexibility (FLEX) versus rigidity (RIG), and impulsivity (IMP) versus reflectivity (REF) each influence whether one perceives novel post-COVID symptoms as surmountable challenges or insurmountable catastrophes. For instance, a field-dependent individual might be more susceptible to media-driven anxieties regarding long COVID, whereas a field-independent person may draw on internal frameworks to maintain a sense of personal control. Similarly, reflective individuals can systematically evaluate evolving medical advice but may risk overthinking; impulsive persons, by contrast, may jump to untested remedies or abandon protocols prematurely. This theoretical analysis advocates an integrated approach, suggesting that salutogenesis depends on aligning one’s dominant cognitive style with strategies that reinforce SOC. Empirical findings across diverse populations indicate that combining flexible coping mechanisms with meaningful social support fosters more positive long-term outcomes. Conversely, rigid or intolerant styles, coupled with low SOC, can accelerate feelings of helplessness, as prolonged symptom unpredictability heightens psychological distress. Hence, interventions aiming to sustain or rebuild SOC - especially those tailored to a patient’s cognitive style - can mitigate the adverse effects of post-COVID syndrome. Through acknowledging and harnessing these dynamic interactions, practitioners may design more personalized programs that not only address the enduring physical facets of post-COVID but also enhance resilience and psychological well-being.

2025-01-01T00:00:00Z Lunov, V. Rozhkova, I. http://ir.librarynmu.com/handle/123456789/16634 2025-11-06T14:39:45Z 2025-01-01T00:00:00Z

Название: The human subjects under professional psychological influence: the expert role of the psychologist in assessment, intervention, and professional selection Авторы: Lunov, V.; Rozhkova, I. Краткий осмотр (реферат): Abstract. This article considers the broad and multifaceted impact that psychologists have on people placed in the roles of patients, research participants, or applicants to various profession-based settings. Far from acting as disinterested observers or passive administrators of standardised batteries of questions, psychologists play an active, and often a poorly recognised, role in the construction of psychological subjectivity. Their impact is exercised across three main areas: psychological examination, therapeutic or institutional intervention, and selection to the professions. Based on the latest empirical and theoretical literature, this article examines how psychological testing is not only a diagnostic technology but also a practice that shapes identity, with long-term consequences for the individual. The psychologist as intervener is also explored in terms of ethics codes, situational pressures, and community-based empowerment models. In the area of selection for the professions, psychologists have decision-making power that determines people's career paths and access to opportunities, frequently in circumstances where fairness, cultural bias, and procedural openness are paramount issues. In organising the analysis, a comparative model is constructed, charting psychologist roles in different application domains and setting out commonality as well as challenges across domains. Special emphasis is placed on evidence-based interventions, digital technologies, and socio-political demands that condition psychological practice today. Recent research is synthesised to demonstrate that as psychological technologies have become more sophisticated, their deployment continues to depend upon the interpretive authority and ethical competence of the practitioner. The article concludes by calling for a more reflective and ethically grounded practice, in which psychologists recognise the inescapably interventionist nature of their work and reflect upon the guidelines that underpin their actions. Through such reflexivity, coupled with research rigour and cultural sensitivity, psychological influence can remain constructive, fair, and respectful of human complexity.

2025-01-01T00:00:00Z Lunov, V. http://ir.librarynmu.com/handle/123456789/16633 2025-11-06T14:20:06Z 2025-01-01T00:00:00Z

Название: Post-COVID syndrome: neurocognitive and memtal health implications in adults and the role of metacognitive psychotherapy and neurogymnastics Авторы: Lunov, V. Краткий осмотр (реферат): Abstract. This article addresses the long-term consequences of COVID-19, commonly referred to as “post-COVID syndrome,” which encompasses a wide range of neurocognitive and mental health disturbances persisting for weeks or months beyond the acute infection. Prominent among these are memory deficits, attentional impairments, and executive dysfunction, alongside psychiatric manifestations such as anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. The discussion underscores that even so-called “brain fog,” which may not always be verified by objective testing, significantly degrades quality of life and necessitates a comprehensive approach to rehabilitation. The article delves into key factors influencing the trajectory of post-COVID syndrome. These include neuroinflammatory processes, dysregulated immune responses, and vascular complications, as well as psychosocial factors linked to pandemic-related stress and isolation. The authors highlight that prolonged uncertainty about recovery can exacerbate anxiety, fatigue, and cognitive impairments, underscoring the importance of holistic, non-pharmacological strategies in post-COVID care. Metacognitive psychotherapy emerges as a promising intervention aimed at identifying and correcting ineffective cognitive strategies, such as excessive worry or rumination, which can intensify symptom severity. Techniques like Attention Training and Detached Mindfulness help mitigate cognitive load and reduce internal stress. In parallel, the article presents neurogymnastics—a structured set of cognitive and physical exercises—as another key element. By stimulating neuroplasticity and fostering the renewal of disrupted neural pathways, neurogymnastics may strengthen executive functions and enhance overall cognitive resilience in individuals recovering from COVID-19. Emphasis is placed on personalized treatment protocols that account for varying degrees of cognitive impairment, comorbidities, and emotional states. The role of telehealth is also discussed, given that online delivery offers both continuous engagement and flexibility in scheduling, particularly crucial for patients with limited access to healthcare facilities. Finally, the authors call for further research, including long-term, randomized controlled trials, to refine methods of metacognitive psychotherapy and neurogymnastics. Determining the optimal “dose” of such interventions and evaluating their synergy with other recovery measures will be critical for maximizing rehabilitation outcomes. A more integrated, evidence-based model could substantially improve quality of life for those experiencing post-COVID syndrome, offering a multifaceted and dynamic path toward cognitive and emotional restoration.

2025-01-01T00:00:00Z Lunov, V. Didukh, M. http://ir.librarynmu.com/handle/123456789/16632 2025-11-06T14:11:36Z 2025-01-01T00:00:00Z

Название: Intuitive determination in decision-making: a cognitive style perspective Авторы: Lunov, V.; Didukh, M. Краткий осмотр (реферат): Abstract. Decision-making is a complex cognitive process influenced by both intuitive and analytical reasoning. Cognitive styles - characteristic ways individuals perceive, process, and use information - are crucial in determining whether decisionmakers rely on intuition or deliberate analysis. This paper explores the interplay between cognitive styles and situational factors in decision-making strategies. The dual-process theory provides a framework for understanding how System 1 (fast, intuitive thinking) and System 2 (slow, analytical reasoning) interact in decisionmaking. Recent research highlights that individuals with impulsive, field-dependent, and abstract cognitive styles are more likely to rely on intuition. In contrast, those with reflective, field-independent, and concrete styles tend to engage in structured analysis. However, situational factors such as task complexity, time pressure, and expertise can shift the balance between intuitive and analytical reasoning. While intuition enables rapid decision-making in high-pressure or uncertain environments, it can also lead to heuristic errors when lacking domainspecific expertise. This paper reviews key studies on cognitive styles, intuition, and decision-making, addressing their implications for education, leadership, and AIassisted decision-making. Findings suggest that personalised learning strategies, metacognitive training, and adaptive decision-making models can enhance the effective use of intuition while mitigating biases. Additionally, as artificial intelligence increasingly integrates into decision-making processes, individuals must learn to balance human intuition with AI-driven recommendations. Understanding the relationship between cognitive style and decision-making strategies is critical for optimising judgment, reducing biases, and improving problem-solving across diverse fields.

2025-01-01T00:00:00Z